To NASA: I Approached NEW HORIZON through Math … But They Adopted Intuition Instead, thus, Sunset the Facts By: Researcher Adnan Alshawafi
To NASA: I Approached NEW HORIZON through Math …
But They Adopted Intuition Instead, thus, Sunset the Facts
By: Researcher Adnan Alshawafi
The series of criticism and doubts overshadowed NEW HORIZON mission
began soon after its flyby close to Pluto on July 14th, 2015. This was
triggered by the final photo of Pluto that was drawn by NEW HORIZON team
where the dwarf planet looked completely spherical, etc. That finding
was contrary to the expectations of many scientists and researchers,
including me, since I wrote my full scientific explanation under the
title “Pluto and Charon can’t be both completely spherical”, which dates
back to June, 2015.
Worth mentioning today that scientists at NEW HORIZON interjected
themselves into a global scientific controversy because of what they
have published about the dwarf planet “Pluto”. The result was a lot of
inquiries and doubts which put the credibility of NEW HORIZON on the
stake, the most important that be reversed to NASA, so they bowled as
examples. (Not sure of meaning here, best guess is that it will reflect
badly on NASA.)
In a report, Geekwire site
published an article featuring astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson who
is one of “the most famous scientists in the US,” where Tyson, a
well-known proponent of categorizing Pluto as a dwarf planet, is a
little less excited about the event, calling it “awesome minus 10
percent”.
The Register
also published an article featuring Professor Iain Thomson from the
University of New Mexico, which stated “We heard during the briefing
that Pluto is almost perfectly spherical, which was unexpected
considering what we think happened during its formation, It’s likely
that way back in its history, Pluto was hit by a massive object that
tore away a huge chunk of its mass, which went on to form into the
frozen world’s five moons. But no remnant of that impact can be seen on
the surface or in its current clean, spherical form, etc”.
The Washington Post
site published an article entitled “Heroes and the Secrets of the
Flight to Pluto,” by the scientific writer Joel Achenbach. Some of it
came in the context “Uncertainty about success is implicit in aerospace
engineering – the New Horizons mission was a screaming success, but I’m
not sure everyone grasps how difficult this was to pull off, and how
dicey in the home stretch.” This includes Stern’s tart comment about
astronomers demoting Pluto to “dwarf planet” status. etc.
An article was published by the news.sciencemag
site and written by Eric Hand , where he mentioned how New Horizon got
the final photo of Pluto in an article entitled “How Pluto’s most
spectacular image was made—and nearly lost” and he refuted NEW HORIZON’s
details of Pluto’s surface in another article entitled “Glacier-like
ice flows detected on Pluto’s surface”.
The disclose.tv site
published an article entitled “PLUTO CONSPIRACY THEORISTS CLAIM NEW
HORIZONS VISIT IS ‘BIGGEST LIE IN HISTORY” by researcher Crrow777 who
has many productions around observations in space. Crrow777 published
the photo of Jupiter planet which is more than 700 million kilometers
away from earth and spoke about the false photo taken by NEW HORIZON for
Pluto… etc. (via dailymail.co.uk )
Newsweek site published an article entitled “For Pluto ‘Truthers,’ the New Horizons Mission Is Only the Latest Lie”.
It is very unfortunate today that doubts have surfaced in which the
NEW HORIZON mission is affecting NASA. I am a scientific researcher and
my objective is not to underscore more in the way of doubts, when I have
sent my explanation to the team of NEW HORIZON to try to share a method
to contribute to and to develop science. At the same time, online
criticism targeting New Horizon’s scientists from the world and American
society, in particular, being a world leader in astronomy, means
scientists would reject any phenomena that may affect the credibility
and transparency of science. Some members of American society do praise
my explanations about Pluto.
American blogger Raymond Towers published an article entitled “A challenge for NASA … Is Pluto spherical? by Adnan Alshawafi” in his News Blog verumetinventa. He said “if
you’ve browsed through this blog (mentioning Adnan’s blog), you will
see many, many perspectives being brought to light. Exposing darkness is
a necessary step into bringing about light and changing the world.”
Hence, I hope to bring light to NASA and the world: I refuted the
conclusion assumed unduly by NEW HORIZON that there is nitrogen ice on
Pluto because the flyby of the dwarf planet was closer to the perigee of
its orbit around the sun. The temperature at this distance and low
pressure will not allow the composition of nitrogen ice. The nitrogen
would be in a gaseous state at this atmosphere. Note that the
explanations that the dwarf planet’s atmosphere components including
nitrogen, methane and carbon monoxide were already monitored by the
European Southern Observatory and published on Space.com in a 2009 article by Clara Moskowitz, entitled “Pluto’s Atmosphere Warmer Than Thought”.
The team of New Horizon interpreted the flow of water ice without
logical proof to find a unique discovery for the reclassification of
Pluto as a planet. They may change their interpretation. I think it is
better for them to hold off saying there exists water, as a result of
the interaction of thermal decomposition of oxidative methane component
of carbon monoxide by volcanoes and natural factors on the surface of
Pluto. This gives the relative difference of intensity of icy clouds
compared to the nitrogen in the state of gaseous at atmosphere (we said
icy clouds because the ice on Pluto becomes as a fog like air at Earth
because of the low pressure on the surface of Pluto). So the clouds
appear in abutting with the malformations and cracks on the surface,
which made them believe the ice is flowing, and more importantly, that
icy clouds cover malformations and cracks on the surface, which still
made them believe Pluto is completely spherical.
The limit of this dissertation is more than just explanations of the
truth about Pluto and Charon. It is a presumption and proof that
confirms the correct scientific approach and the strength of mathematics
depended on to write my hypothesis “Compound balance balls,” article on National Yemen,
where I managed to explain the cosmic phenomena logically and
mathematically to find a way out of the two opposite conclusions. I had
been studying the coordinates of Pluto and Charon and researched the
regressive movement (vibratory movement) as indicated in my hypothesis
and that the same movement which are described by New Horizon as a
complex orbital dancing.
On the ground, and by following scientific criteria of the dimensions
and the coordinates released by the photos about Pluto and Charon, they
still assert the complex orbital dance. Earlier I grasped complex
orbital dance, where I had described it as a regressive (vibratory)
movement according to the hypothesis in my book published in 2013 . So I
confirmed an orbital dance after an analysis of the coordinates of
Pluto and Charon in previous photos taken from faraway distances and
labeled by New Horizon as obscure pictures, because I did not imitate
their optical analysis to understand those photos. The scientific
explanation of orbital dance is a regressive movement, or a “vibratory
movement” (disorder of the distance between Pluto and Charon back and
forth and never moves in a regular elliptical orbit – so there are
aphelion and perigee more than once per one orbital rotation of Charon
around Pluto).
So here is the reason of the disorder, in changing in distance, as a
result of changing factors controlling the balance of the attraction
force and the repulsion force between Pluto and Charon, according to my
hypothesis that was published in my book in 2013 ” Hypothesis of
compound balance factitious balls … an approach in astronomy”: ((An orb
charged by the field of the gravity “magnetic attraction field” which is
gained by the space due to the rotation around itself, and the magnetic
field intensity is directly proportional with square root for the
distance)) and: (( An orb which has a volume in space repulses against
all similar other orbs which separate among the space, by the field of
repulsion spread every direction and its effect according to the orbs
surface area in all directions, it prorates reversely with square root
for the distance)) – page 71 .
Where the hypothesis is based on eight laws and eight new
mathematical equations you can realize a mathematical analysis of the
vibratory movement of orbs (compound orbital dance for Pluto and
Charon), which is a result of the change in opposite surfaces between
Pluto and Charon. That means the perspective of Pluto’s surface from
Charon is constantly changing. Also the perspective of Charon’s surface
from Pluto is constantly changing. Therefore, conclude that Pluto and
Charon cannot have completely spherical shape for the both of them.
In other words, The constantly changing distance can also be
attributed to the fact that the mass of Pluto or Charon is not
concentrated in the body’s center. If we break it into halves, we will
see that one half has larger mass than the other half by over 20% in
proportion (5:4) , there is a presence of the deformation in the surface
of Pluto or Charon. This explanation is developed following an in-depth
study of the probabilities and on the applicable concepts.
I also concluded the distance between Pluto center and the common
center of gravity keeps constantly changing. So, the spiral route of
Pluto’s center in its orbit around the sun does not have constant radius
of its spiral route. The motion of Pluto’s center in its orbit around
the sun draws a circle up to a radius of 3000 – 4000 km, but according
to what we know i.e. 2100 km. It seems to us that Pluto’s motion around
the factitious thing in the middle of its orbital spiral route around
the sun , as a result of the compound balance system (binary system) for
Pluto and Charon with the sun, accords to the hypothesis of compound
balance factitious balls.
The scientific efforts through individual or collective contributions
establish humanitarian integration in the process of research, to
understand the cosmic phenomena in a human activity based on sharing.
Re-thinking Pluto as a full planet is a desperate attempt that may
reflect itself on the reputation of NASA as an iconic global scientific
institution. I think it’s time for NASA to reconsider the team of NEW
HORIZON as being close to losing the historical feat of this mission
because of individual partiality to re-classify Pluto as a full planet.
تعليقات