التخطي إلى المحتوى الرئيسي

To NASA: I Approached NEW HORIZON through Math … But They Adopted Intuition Instead, thus, Sunset the Facts By: Researcher Adnan Alshawafi


To NASA: I Approached NEW HORIZON through Math …
But They Adopted Intuition Instead, thus, Sunset the Facts
By: Researcher Adnan Alshawafi
The series of criticism and doubts overshadowed NEW HORIZON mission began soon after its flyby close to Pluto on July 14th, 2015. This was triggered by the final photo of Pluto that was drawn by NEW HORIZON team where the dwarf planet looked completely spherical, etc. That finding was contrary to the expectations of many scientists and researchers, including me, since I wrote my full scientific explanation under the title “Pluto and Charon can’t be both completely spherical”, which dates back to June, 2015.
Worth mentioning today that scientists at NEW HORIZON interjected themselves into a global scientific controversy because of what they have published about the dwarf planet “Pluto”. The result was a lot of inquiries and doubts which put the credibility of NEW HORIZON on the stake, the most important that be reversed to NASA, so they bowled as examples. (Not sure of meaning here, best guess is that it will reflect badly on NASA.)
In a report, Geekwire site published an article featuring astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson who is one of “the most famous scientists in the US,” where Tyson, a well-known proponent of categorizing Pluto as a dwarf planet, is a little less excited about the event, calling it “awesome minus 10 percent”.
The Register also published an article featuring Professor Iain Thomson from the University of New Mexico, which stated “We heard during the briefing that Pluto is almost perfectly spherical, which was unexpected considering what we think happened during its formation, It’s likely that way back in its history, Pluto was hit by a massive object that tore away a huge chunk of its mass, which went on to form into the frozen world’s five moons. But no remnant of that impact can be seen on the surface or in its current clean, spherical form, etc”.
The Washington Post site published an article entitled “Heroes and the Secrets of the Flight to Pluto,” by the scientific writer Joel Achenbach. Some of it came in the context “Uncertainty about success is implicit in aerospace engineering – the New Horizons mission was a screaming success, but I’m not sure everyone grasps how difficult this was to pull off, and how dicey in the home stretch.” This includes Stern’s tart comment about astronomers demoting Pluto to “dwarf planet” status. etc.
An article was published by the news.sciencemag site and written by Eric Hand , where he mentioned how New Horizon got the final photo of Pluto in an article entitled “How Pluto’s most spectacular image was made—and nearly lost” and he refuted NEW HORIZON’s details of Pluto’s surface in another article entitled “Glacier-like ice flows detected on Pluto’s surface”.
The disclose.tv site published an article entitled “PLUTO CONSPIRACY THEORISTS CLAIM NEW HORIZONS VISIT IS ‘BIGGEST LIE IN HISTORY” by researcher Crrow777 who has many productions around observations in space. Crrow777  published the photo of Jupiter planet which is more than 700 million kilometers away from earth and spoke about the false photo taken by NEW HORIZON for Pluto… etc. (via dailymail.co.uk )
Newsweek site published an article entitled “For Pluto ‘Truthers,’ the New Horizons Mission Is Only the Latest Lie”.
It is very unfortunate today that doubts have surfaced in which the NEW HORIZON mission is affecting NASA. I am a scientific researcher and my objective is not to underscore more in the way of doubts, when I have sent my explanation to the team of NEW HORIZON to try to share a method to contribute to and to develop science. At the same time, online criticism targeting New Horizon’s scientists from the world and American society, in particular, being a world leader in astronomy, means scientists would reject any phenomena that may affect the credibility and transparency of science. Some members of American society do praise my explanations about Pluto.
American blogger Raymond Towers published an article entitled “A challenge for NASA … Is Pluto spherical? by Adnan Alshawafi” in his News Blog verumetinventa. He said “if you’ve browsed through this blog (mentioning Adnan’s blog), you will see many, many perspectives being brought to light. Exposing darkness is a necessary step into bringing about light and changing the world.”
Hence, I hope to bring light to NASA and the world: I refuted the conclusion assumed unduly by NEW HORIZON that there is nitrogen ice on Pluto because the flyby of the dwarf planet was closer to the perigee of its orbit around the sun. The temperature at this distance and low pressure will not allow the composition of nitrogen ice. The nitrogen would be in a gaseous state at this atmosphere. Note that the explanations that the dwarf planet’s atmosphere components including nitrogen, methane and carbon monoxide were already monitored by the European Southern Observatory and published on Space.com in a 2009 article by Clara Moskowitz, entitled “Pluto’s Atmosphere Warmer Than Thought”.
The team of New Horizon interpreted the flow of water ice without logical proof to find a unique discovery for the reclassification of Pluto as a planet. They may change their interpretation. I think it is better for them to hold off saying there exists water, as a result of the interaction of thermal decomposition of oxidative methane component of carbon monoxide by volcanoes and natural factors on the surface of Pluto. This  gives the relative difference of intensity of icy clouds compared to the nitrogen in the state of gaseous at atmosphere (we said icy clouds because the ice on Pluto becomes as a fog like air at Earth because of the low pressure on the surface of Pluto). So the clouds appear in abutting with the malformations and cracks on the surface, which made them believe the ice is flowing, and more importantly, that icy clouds cover malformations and cracks on the surface, which still made them believe Pluto is completely spherical.
The limit of this dissertation is more than just explanations of the truth about Pluto and Charon. It is a presumption and proof that confirms the correct scientific approach and the strength of mathematics depended on to write my hypothesis “Compound balance balls,” article on National Yemen, where I managed to explain the cosmic phenomena logically and mathematically to find a way out of the two opposite conclusions. I had been studying the coordinates of Pluto and Charon and researched the regressive movement (vibratory movement) as indicated in my hypothesis and that the same movement which are described by New Horizon as a complex orbital dancing.
On the ground, and by following scientific criteria of the dimensions and the coordinates released by the photos about Pluto and Charon, they still assert the complex orbital dance. Earlier I grasped complex orbital dance, where I had described it as a regressive (vibratory) movement according to the hypothesis in my book published in 2013 . So I confirmed an orbital dance  after an analysis of the coordinates of Pluto and Charon in previous photos taken from faraway distances and labeled by New Horizon as obscure pictures, because I did not imitate their optical analysis to understand those photos. The scientific explanation of orbital dance is a regressive movement, or a “vibratory movement” (disorder of the distance between Pluto and Charon back and forth and never moves in a regular elliptical orbit – so there are aphelion and perigee more than once per one orbital rotation of Charon around Pluto).
So here is the reason of the disorder, in changing in distance, as a result of changing factors controlling the balance of the attraction force and the repulsion force between Pluto and Charon, according to my hypothesis that was published in my book in 2013 ” Hypothesis of compound balance factitious balls … an approach in astronomy”: ((An orb charged by the field of the gravity “magnetic attraction field” which is gained by the space due to the rotation around itself, and the magnetic field intensity is directly proportional with square root for the distance)) and: (( An orb which has a volume in space repulses against all similar other orbs which separate among the space, by the field of repulsion spread every direction and its effect according to the orbs surface area in all directions, it prorates reversely with square root for the distance)) – page 71 .
Where the hypothesis is based on eight laws and eight new mathematical equations you can realize a mathematical analysis of the vibratory movement of orbs (compound orbital dance for Pluto and Charon), which is a result of the change in opposite surfaces between Pluto and Charon.  That means the perspective of Pluto’s surface from Charon is constantly changing. Also the perspective of Charon’s surface from Pluto is constantly changing. Therefore, conclude that Pluto and Charon cannot have completely spherical shape for the both of them.
In other words, The constantly changing distance can also be attributed to the fact that the mass of Pluto or Charon is not concentrated in the body’s center. If we break it into halves, we will see that one half has larger mass than the other half by over 20% in proportion (5:4) , there is a presence of the deformation in the surface of Pluto or Charon. This explanation is developed following an in-depth study of the probabilities and on the applicable concepts.
I also concluded the distance between Pluto center and the common center of gravity keeps constantly changing. So, the spiral route of Pluto’s center in its orbit around the sun does not have constant radius of its spiral route. The motion of Pluto’s center in its orbit around the sun draws a circle up to a radius of 3000 – 4000 km, but according to what we know i.e. 2100 km. It seems to us that Pluto’s motion around the factitious thing in the middle of its orbital spiral route around the sun , as a result of the compound balance system (binary system) for Pluto and Charon with the sun, accords to the hypothesis of compound balance factitious balls.
The scientific efforts through individual or collective contributions establish humanitarian integration in the process of research, to understand the cosmic phenomena in a human activity based on sharing. Re-thinking Pluto as a full planet is a desperate attempt that may reflect itself on the reputation of NASA as an iconic global scientific institution. I think it’s time for NASA to reconsider the team of NEW HORIZON as being close to losing the historical feat of this mission because of individual partiality to re-classify Pluto as a full planet.




http://www.almashhad-alyemeni.com/news58667.html

http://www.phys4arab.net/vb/showthread.php?t=76557

تعليقات

المشاركات الشائعة من هذه المدونة

Supporting the Global plan for sustainable development 2030 , Planetearth forum : Organize a seminar supporting goal No.4 Quality Education entitled: "Interpretation of Compound Motion for Binary System (Pluto – Charon) by Compound Balance Balls Hypothesis" For Astronomer : Adnan A. Alshawafi The seminar held in coordination and under the patronage of scientific and astronomical society of Yemen like Sana'a University – Sciences Faculty and Science & Technology centre , Astronomical society of Yemen, Yemen Remote sensing centre & GIS , Cultural & Natural Heritage Protection Foundation Andthe Yemeni press.. The aims of seminar to clarify interpretations of astronomer and researcher / Adnan Alshawafi about Compound Motion for Binary System (Pluto – Charon) by Compound Balance Balls Hypothesis The researcherbeganthe seminarby proving that data about Pluto and Charon published by New Horizon or NASA or other resources, are a contradictory and are not applicable to the…

الفلكي عدنان الشوافي : يكشف فيها عن دورة الكسوف و الخسوف و يوضح عدة ظواهر طبيعية و موجز عن فرضية كرات الاتزان المركبة... في مقابلة ثرية بالمعلومة

مقابلة الباحث و الفلكي عدنان على الشوافي في الاسبوعية الرسمية "26 سبتمبر"


اقراء في الحوار :-
- دعوة الى وكالة فضاء يمنية
- عن ظاهرة النينو
- الزلازل ترجع لعوامل فلكية و جولوجية / طقس
- كيف تتكرر الاحداث كل 18 سنة و تعود بعد 54 سنة
- الكسوف و الخسوف دقيقة و ليست مجرد تخمين
- علم الفلك اليمني و العربي غني بالعلم وان كان بلغة المزارع او المسافر.
- عن فرضية كرات الاتزان المركبة .


الجزء الأول من المقابلة
-  -  -   - - -
كان في العدد (1963).
الخميس 22 فبراير 2018 الموافق 6 جمادي الاخرة 1438 هجرية



■ علم الفلك في اليمن يعيش في زاوية غير معروفة ... اين انتم ترونه؟

■■ علم الفلك في اليمن خاصة والوطن العربي عامة ذو بعد تاريخي غزيز بالمعرفة والعلوم، قد يكون على العموم كما ذكرت في زاوية غير معروفة، لعدم الالتفات
اليه والانشغال عنه او لتوجيه التركيز الى زوايا اخرى ، اما بالنسبة لنا نجد فيه منبع رئيسي للعلم يستحق ان نضاهي وننافس به بل نتفوق على ما هو موجود في دول متقدمة... ليس من باب المدح ولكنها الحقيقة... فقط قد نحتاج الى اعادة صياغة واخراج المعلومات والمخطوطات من المنظور الشعبي او التقليدي، الى ال…