التخطي إلى المحتوى الرئيسي

المشاركات

Is Pluto completely spherical …… What is the logical interpretation of orbital dance

Is Pluto completely spherical …… What is the logical interpretation of orbital dance A Yemeni astronomy researcher tables some inquires for NASA to explain the vagueness facing mission to understand the variation in the glow on the Pluto surface " New Horizon is a NASA- sponsored mission which is set to study Pluto – the Planet- and its moons as well as the Cabiier belt. This spaceship was launched in 19 June 2006 from the earth and has been speeding up and accelerating to reach the tiny planet “Pluto”. It runs at an average speed on 1 million KM/day and , thus, considered to be the speediest man-made machine. It was expected to reach the target by14 June 2015. The mission has succeeded in taking some photos of the Pluto and recently scientists and New Horizon Team have been considering the closest photos taken of the planet this year, which shows a great variation in the shining surface of the Pluto amid some explanations, which said that it was due to the

Adnan Alshawafi : Orbital dance about as a result of non-spherical planet Pluto or its moon Charon

Adnan Alshawafi : Orbital dance about as a result of non-spherical planet Pluto or its moon Charon Writing in the mother tongue عدنان الشوافي : الرقصة المدارية هي نتيجة عدم كروية في الكوكب بلوتو و قمره شارون ان ما افصحت عنه ناسا عن حركة الكوكب بلوتو و القمر شارون ووصفتها بالرقصة المدارية في الافلام و الصور التي التقطت بواسطة المركبة نيو هورايزون حديثا في نهاية يونيو و مطلع الشهر الحالي يوليو 2015 م و ارجعت السبب الى كبر حجم الكوكب بلوتو و كان الباحث اليمني في علم الفلك عدنان الشوافي قد طرح تفسيراته و من ضمنها استنتاج تلك الرقصة المدارية من صور سابقة وكان قد وصفها بالحركة الاهتزازية ( الارتدادية ) في مقالاته و يشير انها ليست رقصة عشوائية بل حركة اتزانيه يمكن حسابها بدقة و يدلل ان فرضيته عام 2013 كانت قد فسرت نفس الاضطراب او الرقصة حاصل لمدار للقمر هايبرون حول الكوكب زحل ولم تحصل الحركة او الرقصة لزحل نتيجة لكبره الهائل جدا نسبة الى القمر هايبرون ، وان ذلك ناتج عن عدم انتظام شكل القمر هايبرون ( ليس كروي ) و بناء على قوانين و معادلات الفرضية نستخلص تلك الحركة ( الرقصة بحسب وصف ن

عدنان الشوافي : الرقصة المدارية هي نتيجة عدم كروية في الكوكب بلوتو و قمره شارون

Adnan Alshawafi : Orbital dance about as a result of non-spherical planet Pluto or its moon Charon Writing in the mother tongue عدنان الشوافي : الرقصة المدارية هي نتيجة عدم كروية في الكوكب بلوتو و قمره شارون ان ما افصحت عنه ناسا عن حركة الكوكب بلوتو و القمر شارون ووصفتها بالرقصة المدارية في الافلام و الصور التي التقطت بواسطة المركبة نيو هورايزون حديثا في نهاية يونيو و مطلع الشهر الحالي يوليو 2015 م و ارجعت السبب الى كبر حجم الكوكب بلوتو و كان الباحث اليمني في علم الفلك عدنان الشوافي قد طرح تفسيراته و من ضمنها استنتاج تلك الرقصة المدارية من صور سابقة وكان قد وصفها بالحركة الاهتزازية ( الارتدادية ) في مقالاته و يشير انها ليست رقصة عشوائية بل حركة اتزانيه يمكن حسابها بدقة و يدلل ان فرضيته عام 2013 كانت قد فسرت نفس الاضطراب او الرقصة حاصل لمدار للقمر هايبرون حول الكوكب زحل ولم تحصل الحركة او الرقصة لزحل نتيجة لكبره الهائل جدا نسبة الى القمر هايبرون  ، وان ذلك ناتج عن عدم انتظام شكل القمر هايبرون ( ليس كروي ) و بناء على قوانين و معادلات الفرضية نستخلص تلك الحركة ( الرقصة بحسب وصف

A yemeni researcher in astronomy Adnan Al-Shawafi precedes NASA in explaining the facts about Pluto

A yemeni researcher in astronomy Adnan Al-Shawafi precedes NASA in explaining the facts about Pluto The media center of New Horizon (a space mission to explore Pluto the planet) has published in 22 June 2015 fresh photos of Pluto taken from a closer distance as the Spaceship got nearer showing that the planet is more than double in size compared to previous photos. The new photos revealed that Pluto is not perfectly spherical despite earlier announcement by the same center (11 June 2015) in which they ruled out Pluto is not spherical even it appeared like that due to technical failure in processing the then photos. But when those photos were analyzed by the researcher Adnan Al Shawafi, he concluded that the planet is not spherical in shape and those conclusions have been sent to NASA on 22nd of June 2015 and were published on that same date in his own blogging snd related forums as well as social media networks. Yemeni news websites followed suit and published his conclusions asserti

A Yemeni astronomy researcher tables some inquires for NASA to explain the vagueness facing Apollo mission to understand the variation in the glow on the Pluto surface . New Horizon is a NASA- sponsored mission which is set to study Pluto – the Planet- and its moons as well as the Cabiier belt. This spaceship was launched in 19 June 2006 from the earth and has been speeding up and accelerating to reach the tiny planet “Pluto”. It runs at an average speed on 1 million KM/day and , thus, considered to be the speediest man-made machine. It was expected to reach the target by14 June 2015. The mission has succeeded in taking some photos of the Pluto and recently scientists and New Horizon Team have been considering the closest photos taken of the planet this year, which shows a great variation in the shining surface of the Pluto amid some explanations, which said that it was due to the polar cover. Nevertheless, scientists and analyzing team at New Horizon still face a lot of opacity in explaining the photo taken. Early on, the Yemeni scientists Adnan Al Shawafi – astronomy researcher - has been following the mission and all materials published to that end. After examining and analyzing the photos, Mr. Al Shawafi arrived at two conclusions or, more correctly, the same finding with two different explanations as follows: First conclusion: it is based on applicable laws and concepts which says that the variation in shininess is due to the irregular shape of Pluto since it is not a perfectly spherical or elliptical and the evidence of that is its regressive movement (vibratory movement back and fro and never moves in a regular elliptical orbit) around its A common center of mass located outside its center. The same regressive movement applies its double moon Sharon i.e. the distance between Sharon the moon and Pluto the planet is changing up and down but it was not recognizable because of the narrow vision angle. The Charon orbital movement around the Pluto. No attention was given as well because the Moon surface movement is irregular since Charon day equals its month and that the time it takes to rotate around itself equals the time used to rotate around Pluto. Therefore, the vision dimensions of Charon and its surface is fixed all the time with Pluto. The reason why the distance between the planet and its moon keep changing can also be attributed to the fact that Pluto's mass is not concentrated in the center of the planet. In other words, if we break it into halves, we will see that one half has larger mass than the other half by over 20%. This explanation is developed following an in-depth study of the probabilities and on the applicable concepts. The second conclusion: is the same explanation of movement furnished in the hypothesis tabled by the researcher Adnan Al Shawafi and published in 2013 which contains 8 laws and 8 math formulas explaining the balance of orbs in compound universal systems as well as additional dimensions of the universe. In his hypothesis, the researcher developed a set of explanations and predictions concerning planet Pluto including its common balance with its moon Sharon and that Pluto is rotating around a factitious center outside its body at a distance of 5400 km though the existing laws and circulated information did not conclude to even 50% of the distance concluded by the researcher even before publishing his hypothesis and related articles on the balance of planet Pluto published in the web and key words can be used to search for these submissions. My publications were to show my persistence and confidence in my hypothesis and the dimensions of the Pluto being a spherical in shape with an approximate area of its space 16.69 million km2. The newly released photos obtained from New Horizon asserts the fact that Pluto's shape is irregular and that the distance can go up and down by 20% which is still double the distance known and proven by gravity laws and other laws in use although I believe there is a 100% difference in the estimated distance between Pluto center and the common center of mass outside Pluto's center according to the Balance Balls Hypothesis. Hence, the researcher Adnan Al Shawafi calls on NASA and New Horizon mission to pay due attention to his explanations and conclusions elucidating the variation found in the photos taken by New Horizon which he deemed it worth sharing to further analyze the vagueness under question. All rights reserved