A yemeni researcher in astronomy Adnan Al-Shawafi precedes NASA in explaining the facts about Pluto
The media center of New Horizon (a space mission to explore Pluto the
planet) has published in 22 June 2015 fresh photos of Pluto taken from
a closer distance as the Spaceship got nearer showing that the planet
is more than double in size compared to previous photos. The new
photos revealed that Pluto is not perfectly spherical despite earlier
announcement by the same center (11 June 2015) in which they ruled out
Pluto is not spherical even it appeared like that due to technical
failure in processing the then photos. But when those photos were
analyzed by the researcher Adnan Al Shawafi, he concluded that the
planet is not spherical in shape and those conclusions have been sent
to NASA on 22nd of June 2015 and were published on that same date in
his own blogging snd related forums as well as social media networks.
Yemeni news websites followed suit and published his conclusions
asserting that Pluto is not perfecly spherical or elliptical on 23rd
of June 2015 plus other findings arrived at by the researcher based on
his self-concluded theory on Compound Balance Balls revealed in 2013.
Hence, this shall be considered a prescience by the researcher and an
assertion of the scientific power of the theory he relied on.
In this respect, the researcher says that he didn't imitates the
approach followed by NASA and other science bodies in charge of the
New Horizon mission when it comes to explaining the layout of of photo
taken. Meanwhile, my hypothesis is built on eight laws and eight math
formulas all of them concentrated on the coordinates of Pluto planet
and its moon using the previously taken photos which NASA failed to
conclude - using those same old photos - to reveal whether the planet
is not spherical and announced vague explanations.
The researcher says also that he is pleased to table his scientific
explanation to NASA so to understand the
rebound movement (vibratory - both the planet and its moon move back
and fro and never moves in a fixed elliptical orbit). Such movement,
he says, is due to the fact that the planet is not perfectly spherical
which goes against NASA conclusion describing the planet movement as
"orbital dance" without explaining what cause such movement. NASA
scientists going to say the reason is that the Planet body center is not
located right in the center i.e. one part has more mass than the
other, and this is not a reasonable evidence though the researcher has
raised such issue to assure that we do understand what they have and
what we do and that no announcement made yet to show that the dual
mass center outside the planet is changing and not at the same
distance from the planet. I do hope that NASA reveals such
informations in the days to come.
The media center of New Horizon (a space mission to explore Pluto the
planet) has published in 22 June 2015 fresh photos of Pluto taken from
a closer distance as the Spaceship got nearer showing that the planet
is more than double in size compared to previous photos. The new
photos revealed that Pluto is not perfectly spherical despite earlier
announcement by the same center (11 June 2015) in which they ruled out
Pluto is not spherical even it appeared like that due to technical
failure in processing the then photos. But when those photos were
analyzed by the researcher Adnan Al Shawafi, he concluded that the
planet is not spherical in shape and those conclusions have been sent
to NASA on 22nd of June 2015 and were published on that same date in
his own blogging snd related forums as well as social media networks.
Yemeni news websites followed suit and published his conclusions
asserting that Pluto is not perfecly spherical or elliptical on 23rd
of June 2015 plus other findings arrived at by the researcher based on
his self-concluded theory on Compound Balance Balls revealed in 2013.
Hence, this shall be considered a prescience by the researcher and an
assertion of the scientific power of the theory he relied on.
In this respect, the researcher says that he didn't imitates the
approach followed by NASA and other science bodies in charge of the
New Horizon mission when it comes to explaining the layout of of photo
taken. Meanwhile, my hypothesis is built on eight laws and eight math
formulas all of them concentrated on the coordinates of Pluto planet
and its moon using the previously taken photos which NASA failed to
conclude - using those same old photos - to reveal whether the planet
is not spherical and announced vague explanations.
The researcher says also that he is pleased to table his scientific
explanation to NASA so to understand the
rebound movement (vibratory - both the planet and its moon move back
and fro and never moves in a fixed elliptical orbit). Such movement,
he says, is due to the fact that the planet is not perfectly spherical
which goes against NASA conclusion describing the planet movement as
"orbital dance" without explaining what cause such movement. NASA
scientists going to say the reason is that the Planet body center is not
located right in the center i.e. one part has more mass than the
other, and this is not a reasonable evidence though the researcher has
raised such issue to assure that we do understand what they have and
what we do and that no announcement made yet to show that the dual
mass center outside the planet is changing and not at the same
distance from the planet. I do hope that NASA reveals such
informations in the days to come.
Researcher conclusions was entitled " A Yemeni astronomy researcher tables some inquires for NASA to explain the vagueness facing Apollo mission to understand the variation in the glow on the Pluto surface " and it was as follows .
New Horizon is a NASA- sponsored mission which is set to study Pluto –
the Planet- and its moons as well as the Cabiier belt. This spaceship
was launched in 19 June 2006 from the earth and has been speeding up
and accelerating to reach the tiny planet “Pluto”. It runs at an
average speed on 1 million KM/day and , thus, considered to be the
speediest man-made machine. It was expected to reach the target by14
June 2015. The mission has succeeded in taking some photos of the
Pluto and recently scientists and New Horizon Team have been
considering the closest photos taken of the planet this year, which
shows a great variation in the shining surface of the Pluto amid some
explanations, which said that it was due to the polar cover.
Nevertheless, scientists and analyzing team at New Horizon still face
a lot of opacity in explaining the photo taken.
Early on, the Yemeni scientists Adnan Al Shawafi – astronomy
researcher - has been following the mission and all materials
published to that end. After examining and analyzing the photos, Mr.
Al Shawafi arrived at two conclusions or, more correctly, the same
finding with two different explanations as follows:
First conclusion: it is based on applicable laws and concepts which
says that the variation in shininess is due to the irregular shape of
Pluto since it is not a perfectly spherical or elliptical and the
evidence of that is its regressive movement (vibratory movement back
and fro and never moves in a regular elliptical orbit) around its
A common center of mass located outside its center. The same regressive movement
applies its double moon Sharon i.e. the distance between Sharon the
moon and Pluto the planet is changing up and down but it was not
recognizable because of the narrow vision angle. The Charon orbital
movement around the Pluto. No attention was given as well because the
Moon surface movement is irregular since Charon day equals its month
and that the time it takes to rotate around itself equals the time
used to rotate around Pluto. Therefore, the vision dimensions of Charon
and its surface is fixed all the time with Pluto.
The reason why the distance between the planet and its moon keep
changing can also be attributed to the fact that Pluto's mass is not
concentrated in the center of the planet. In other words, if we break
it into halves, we will see that one half has larger mass than the
other half by over 20%. This explanation is developed following an
in-depth study of the probabilities and on the applicable concepts.
The second conclusion: is the same explanation of movement furnished
in the hypothesis tabled by the researcher Adnan Al Shawafi and
published in 2013 which contains 8 laws and 8 math formulas explaining
the balance of orbs in compound universal systems as well as
additional dimensions of the universe. In his hypothesis, the
researcher developed a set of explanations and predictions concerning
planet Pluto including its common balance with its moon Sharon and
that Pluto is rotating around a factitious center outside its body at
a distance of 5400 km though the existing laws and circulated
information did not conclude to even 50% of the distance concluded by
the researcher even before publishing his hypothesis and related
articles on the balance of planet Pluto published in the web and key
words can be used to search for these submissions.
My publications were to show my persistence and confidence in my
hypothesis and the dimensions of the Pluto being a spherical in shape
with an approximate area of its space 16.69 million km2. The newly
released photos obtained from New Horizon asserts the fact that
Pluto's shape is irregular and that the distance can go up and down by
20% which is still double the distance known and proven by gravity
laws and other laws in use although I believe there is a 100%
difference in the estimated distance between Pluto center and the
common center of mass outside Pluto's according to the Balance
Balls hypothesis.
Hence, the researcher Adnan Al Shawafi calls on NASA and New Horizon
mission to pay due attention to his explanations and conclusions
elucidating the variation found in the photos taken by New Horizon
which he deemed it worth sharing to further analyze the vagueness
under question.
All rights reserved
the Planet- and its moons as well as the Cabiier belt. This spaceship
was launched in 19 June 2006 from the earth and has been speeding up
and accelerating to reach the tiny planet “Pluto”. It runs at an
average speed on 1 million KM/day and , thus, considered to be the
speediest man-made machine. It was expected to reach the target by14
June 2015. The mission has succeeded in taking some photos of the
Pluto and recently scientists and New Horizon Team have been
considering the closest photos taken of the planet this year, which
shows a great variation in the shining surface of the Pluto amid some
explanations, which said that it was due to the polar cover.
Nevertheless, scientists and analyzing team at New Horizon still face
a lot of opacity in explaining the photo taken.
Early on, the Yemeni scientists Adnan Al Shawafi – astronomy
researcher - has been following the mission and all materials
published to that end. After examining and analyzing the photos, Mr.
Al Shawafi arrived at two conclusions or, more correctly, the same
finding with two different explanations as follows:
First conclusion: it is based on applicable laws and concepts which
says that the variation in shininess is due to the irregular shape of
Pluto since it is not a perfectly spherical or elliptical and the
evidence of that is its regressive movement (vibratory movement back
and fro and never moves in a regular elliptical orbit) around its
A common center of mass located outside its center. The same regressive movement
applies its double moon Sharon i.e. the distance between Sharon the
moon and Pluto the planet is changing up and down but it was not
recognizable because of the narrow vision angle. The Charon orbital
movement around the Pluto. No attention was given as well because the
Moon surface movement is irregular since Charon day equals its month
and that the time it takes to rotate around itself equals the time
used to rotate around Pluto. Therefore, the vision dimensions of Charon
and its surface is fixed all the time with Pluto.
The reason why the distance between the planet and its moon keep
changing can also be attributed to the fact that Pluto's mass is not
concentrated in the center of the planet. In other words, if we break
it into halves, we will see that one half has larger mass than the
other half by over 20%. This explanation is developed following an
in-depth study of the probabilities and on the applicable concepts.
The second conclusion: is the same explanation of movement furnished
in the hypothesis tabled by the researcher Adnan Al Shawafi and
published in 2013 which contains 8 laws and 8 math formulas explaining
the balance of orbs in compound universal systems as well as
additional dimensions of the universe. In his hypothesis, the
researcher developed a set of explanations and predictions concerning
planet Pluto including its common balance with its moon Sharon and
that Pluto is rotating around a factitious center outside its body at
a distance of 5400 km though the existing laws and circulated
information did not conclude to even 50% of the distance concluded by
the researcher even before publishing his hypothesis and related
articles on the balance of planet Pluto published in the web and key
words can be used to search for these submissions.
My publications were to show my persistence and confidence in my
hypothesis and the dimensions of the Pluto being a spherical in shape
with an approximate area of its space 16.69 million km2. The newly
released photos obtained from New Horizon asserts the fact that
Pluto's shape is irregular and that the distance can go up and down by
20% which is still double the distance known and proven by gravity
laws and other laws in use although I believe there is a 100%
difference in the estimated distance between Pluto center and the
common center of mass outside Pluto's according to the Balance
Balls hypothesis.
Hence, the researcher Adnan Al Shawafi calls on NASA and New Horizon
mission to pay due attention to his explanations and conclusions
elucidating the variation found in the photos taken by New Horizon
which he deemed it worth sharing to further analyze the vagueness
under question.
All rights reserved
تعليقات